The rapid introduction of these solutions left little time for insurers to evaluate the optimal balance of risk management benefits against client perception of value. Subsequent performance highlighted the shortcomings in risk-control fund performance benchmarks and has fueled a client perception that these funds erode the “upside potential” of VAs. As a result, several manufacturers who embraced these solutions are now partially or completely unwinding their solutions with substantial impacts on balance sheet risk and economics.
This paper examines the properties of alternative volatility management solutions from the perspective of both policyholders and guarantee manufacturers, with a focus on the role of volatility-indexed fees in a potential “next generation” solution. Its purpose is to provide a framework for manufacturers to evaluate the trade-offs associated with each solution, as well as the implications of certain features.
The global Financial Crisis motivated insurers offering guaranteed variable annuity (VA) products to innovate risk management solutions that mitigate risk exposure to sharp spikes in equity market volatility. Asset transfer programs, “risk-control” funds of various forms, and market-linked fees and benefits have become common fixtures within new guaranteed VA products, with risk-control funds gaining prevalence.
Related Insights
-
Insights Making The Invisible Visible Women are still passed over for the most senior leadership roles with only one in four executives female. What's preventing progress on women in leadership? -
Insights Implementation Of Sustainable Development Goals Recommendations for potential mitigation actions to achieve access to third-party data sources. -
Insights Future Of Financial Intelligence Sharing Overview of concepts and recent technical developments relevant to privacy preserving analytics and includes ten case studies -
Insights How To Make Risk Functions More Courageous Four ways to move beyond fear.